By Sabrina P. Ramet
Read Online or Download Whose Democracy? PDF
Best elections books
As Washington elites drifted towards ideological poles over the last few many years, did usual american citizens keep on with their lead? within the Partisan style, Matthew Levendusky unearths that we have got answered to this trend—but no longer, for the main half, by way of changing into extra severe ourselves. whereas polarization has filtered all the way down to a small minority of citizens, it additionally has had the extra major impression of reconfiguring the best way we kind ourselves into political events.
The important drawback of realizing Political switch is to discover the social and political resources of electoral swap in Britain. From the Labour successes of the Nineteen Sixties throughout the reemergence of the Liberals as a countrywide strength in 1974 and the increase and fall of the SDP to the aptitude emergence of the fairway occasion within the Nineties, Dr Heath and his collaborators chart the regularly altering mold of British politics.
Ladies in Legislative illustration: Electoral platforms, Political events, and intercourse Quotas provides a whole and overseas point of view at the percentage and effect of ladies in nationwide parliaments. extra accurately, it seeks to spot the criteria that impression the proportion of lady parliamentarians, paying specific recognition to the electoral procedure.
Extra info for Whose Democracy?
I am also grateful to George Schöpflin for his feedback on earlier drafts of the introduction and conclusion, to Sami Repishti and Nemanja Marcetic for their feedback on an earlier draft of chapter 6; to Katarzyna Dziwirek for assisting me with the diacritical marks in chapter 4; and to Dasha Koenig for assisting me with the diacritical marks in chapter 5. I also wish to express my gratitude to the anonymous reader contracted by Rowman & Littlefield for most helpful advice and suggestions (including for having suggested the title); to Joan McCarter for preparing the tables used in this volume and for printing out the final manuscript submitted to the press; and to my editor, Susan McEachern, for her interest in this project, her encouragement at every stage, and her helpful suggestions along the way.
34 Page 13 Meyers's argument serves us in two ways. First, it suggests that the entire notion of rights of groups is founded on mythology and, further, that Locke's linkage of Universal Reason with specifically individual rights was well founded. 35 Second, it invites us to speculate as to whether a demand, for example, that Slovaks have a right to speak Slovak anywhere in Slovakia should not, perhaps, be rephrased as a right to speak any language they choose anywhere in Slovakia. Or, to put it another way, which Slovak is freer: the Slovak who is guaranteed the right to speak Slovak (but not any other language) anywhere in Slovakia or the Slovak who is guaranteed the right to speak Slovak or Hungarian or Spanish or Swahili or Esperanto or any other language without fear of punishment?
One can define nationalism in such a way that perhaps no one would object to it. For example, if by nationalism one means merely cultural awareness or civic-mindedness, then it is apparent that a society is enriched and protected by the presence of these phenomena in large amounts. If, on the other hand, one means destructiveness and chauvinism, then it is hard to be positive about the phenomenon. On an understanding of nationalism as destructive chauvinism, John Keane has recently written: Nationalism is a scavenger.