Voting and collective decision-making by Annick Laruelle

By Annick Laruelle

Each day hundreds of thousands of selections are made by means of all types of committees, parliaments, councils and forums through a 'yes-no' balloting strategy. occasionally a committee can in basic terms settle for or reject the proposals submitted to it for a call. On different events, committee individuals have the potential of editing the idea and bargaining an contract ahead of the vote. In both case, what rule can be used if every one member acts on behalf of a different-sized team? it sort of feels intuitively transparent that if the teams are of other sizes then a symmetric rule (e.g. the straightforward majority or unanimity) isn't compatible. The query then arises of what balloting rule can be used. balloting and Collective Decision-Making addresses this and different matters via a examine of the speculation of bargaining and balloting energy, displaying the way it applies to actual decision-making contexts.

Show description

Read or Download Voting and collective decision-making PDF

Similar elections books

The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans (Chicago Studies in American Politics)

As Washington elites drifted towards ideological poles over the last few many years, did traditional american citizens persist with their lead? within the Partisan type, Matthew Levendusky finds that we have got answered to this trend—but now not, for the main half, by means of turning into extra severe ourselves. whereas polarization has filtered all the way down to a small minority of citizens, it additionally has had the extra major influence of reconfiguring the best way we kind ourselves into political events.

Understanding Political Change. The British Voter 1964–1987

The relevant hindrance of knowing Political swap is to discover the social and political resources of electoral switch in Britain. From the Labour successes of the Nineteen Sixties during the reemergence of the Liberals as a countrywide strength in 1974 and the increase and fall of the SDP to the aptitude emergence of the fairway occasion within the Nineteen Nineties, Dr Heath and his collaborators chart the always altering mold of British politics.

Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas

Ladies in Legislative illustration: Electoral platforms, Political events, and intercourse Quotas supplies a whole and overseas point of view at the share and influence of ladies in nationwide parliaments. extra accurately, it seeks to spot the criteria that effect the proportion of girl parliamentarians, paying specific realization to the electoral approach.

Extra info for Voting and collective decision-making

Example text

N (v)) ∈ RN to be considered as a rational evaluation of the prospect of playing game v. i (v) 1. Efficiency. = v(N). i∈N Given a permutation π : N → N and a game v, πv denotes the permuted game defined by πv(π(S)) := v(S), where π(S) = {π(i) : i ∈ S}. That is, πv is the game that results from v by relabelling the players according to π, so that i is in v what π(i) is in πv. 2. Anonymity. For any permutation π, π(i) (πv) = i (v). A player i is a null player in a game v if his/her entering or leaving any coalition never changes its worth, that is, if v(S ∪ i) = v(S), for all S.

We omit the proof, which is an easy exercise. e. functions such that u¯ = u¯ , if and only if there exist α ∈ R++ and β ∈ R such that u = αu + β. Remarks. (i) The assumption that there are both most and least preferred alternatives is not crucial. It has been made only to simplify the proof of Theorem 3, but the results remain valid without this assumption. Only in Theorem 3 do conditions (ii) and (iii) need to be required for any two alternatives a, b, such that b a, condition (ii-1) has to be required for any x, such that b x a, and (ii-2) for any lottery with support between a and b.

In a weighted majority what should be the weight of a seat in order for it to be a dictator’s seat? What should be the weight of a seat in order for it to have a veto? 4. Let W be an N-voting rule. t. 12 ≤ q < 1. Preliminaries 27 5. Consider an eight-seat committee divided into two subgroups: N = A ∪ B with A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} and B = {6, 7, 8}, and two possible rules: Rule 1: A proposal is accepted if it has the support of at least 3 votes from A and at least 2 votes from B. Rule 2: A proposal is accepted if it has the support of at least 5 votes, of which 3 votes must be those from B.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.77 of 5 – based on 49 votes