By Kenneth J. Winkle
This publication examines the impression of westward migration on political improvement and behaviour in Ohio, the main populous midwestern nation throughout the 19th century. Professor Winkle explores the effect of migration on principles of suffrage, the behavior of elections, styles of balloting, recruitment of political leaders, and native get together firms as all of them emerged ahead of the Civil struggle.
Read Online or Download The Politics of Community: Migration and Politics in Antebellum Ohio PDF
Similar elections books
As Washington elites drifted towards ideological poles over the last few a long time, did usual americans keep on with their lead? within the Partisan type, Matthew Levendusky unearths that we have got spoke back to this trend—but no longer, for the main half, via turning into extra severe ourselves. whereas polarization has filtered right down to a small minority of electorate, it additionally has had the extra major impact of reconfiguring the best way we kind ourselves into political events.
The valuable predicament of realizing Political swap is to discover the social and political assets of electoral switch in Britain. From the Labour successes of the Nineteen Sixties in the course of the reemergence of the Liberals as a countrywide strength in 1974 and the increase and fall of the SDP to the aptitude emergence of the golf green occasion within the Nineteen Nineties, Dr Heath and his collaborators chart the consistently altering mildew of British politics.
Ladies in Legislative illustration: Electoral platforms, Political events, and intercourse Quotas offers a whole and overseas standpoint at the percentage and impression of girls in nationwide parliaments. extra accurately, it seeks to spot the criteria that effect the proportion of girl parliamentarians, paying specific awareness to the electoral procedure.
Extra resources for The Politics of Community: Migration and Politics in Antebellum Ohio
Already, the strategist was moving on to more pressing matters. The confrontation with Slater was just another campaign event, part strategy, part emotion. Karl Rove has a fine eye for working journalists up to the edge, bullying and cajoling, and then pulling back. Rove had made his point. In the future, the reporter, and those in the campaign press corps watching from a few feet away, might exercise more caution when writing about him. No doubt the Dallas story had set Rove’s teeth to grinding over his morning coffee.
Slater reminded Rove that he had never protested a profile he had written months before, which referred to the Post story. “They said it. A newspaper said it, okay. ” Rove knew that the story was certain to be picked up by a growing group of national reporters who, from now on, would simply state that Rove was a master of dirty tricks. In his view, nobody had ever proved he was involved in campaign skullduggery. A newspaper had reported it, yes, but his opponents based their belief that Rove had used dirty tricks on unsubstantiated allegations in a political race years ago as a young Republican.
Most elementary school boys were probably reading The Hardy Boys or Lank of the Little League, but not Rove. And during the campaign, he prominently passed around to staffers a political tract he carried. The pamphlet, written by Michael Novak, was about mediating structures in politics. Rove said the treatise helped him to realize he had to change the nature of the Republican party and foreshadow what was coming next. ” Rove also told a reporter that, in grammar school, he wrote an essay on dialectical materialism.