Cleft Countries - Regional Political Divisions and Cultures by Ivan Katchanovski

By Ivan Katchanovski

Through the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine, the second one biggest state in Europe got here with regards to a violent break-up just like that during neighboring Moldova, which witnessed a violent secession of the Transdniestria sector. quite a few elections, together with the hotly contested 2004 presidential elections in Ukraine, and surveys of public opinion confirmed major neighborhood divisions in those post-Soviet international locations. Western components of Ukraine and Moldova, in addition to the Muslim Crimean Tatars, have been vocal supporters of independence, nationalist, and pro-Western events and politicians. against this, jap areas, in addition to the Orthodox Turkic-speaking Gagauz, continually expressed pro-Russian and pro-Communist political orientations. Which elements ? old legacies, faith, financial system, ethnicity, or political management ? may clarify those divisions? Why used to be Ukraine in a position to stay away from a violent break-up, not like Moldova?
this can be the 1st booklet to supply a scientific and comparative research of the neighborhood political divisions in post-Soviet Ukraine and Moldova. The learn examines balloting habit and political attitudes in teams of areas: these which have been lower than Russian, Ottoman, and Soviet rule; and people which have been below Austro-Hungarian, Polish, Romanian, and Czechoslovak rule till international conflict I or global struggle II. This booklet attributes the nearby political divisions to the diversities in ancient event. This examine is helping us to higher comprehend local cleavages and conflicts, not just in Ukraine and Moldova, but in addition in different cleft nations.

Show description

Read or Download Cleft Countries - Regional Political Divisions and Cultures in Post-Soviet Ukraine and Moldova PDF

Best elections books

The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans (Chicago Studies in American Politics)

As Washington elites drifted towards ideological poles over the last few many years, did usual americans stick to their lead? within the Partisan kind, Matthew Levendusky finds that we have got answered to this trend—but now not, for the main half, by means of changing into extra severe ourselves. whereas polarization has filtered all the way down to a small minority of electorate, it additionally has had the extra major impact of reconfiguring the best way we variety ourselves into political events.

Understanding Political Change. The British Voter 1964–1987

The important trouble of knowing Political swap is to discover the social and political resources of electoral switch in Britain. From the Labour successes of the Nineteen Sixties during the reemergence of the Liberals as a countrywide strength in 1974 and the increase and fall of the SDP to the aptitude emergence of the fairway celebration within the Nineties, Dr Heath and his collaborators chart the always altering mildew of British politics.

Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas

Ladies in Legislative illustration: Electoral platforms, Political events, and intercourse Quotas offers a whole and overseas standpoint at the share and impression of girls in nationwide parliaments. extra accurately, it seeks to spot the criteria that impact the proportion of lady parliamentarians, paying specific realization to the electoral procedure.

Extra resources for Cleft Countries - Regional Political Divisions and Cultures in Post-Soviet Ukraine and Moldova

Example text

This does not mean that most voters lacked information that would allow for low-level instrumental voting. California’s publicly provided ballot pamphlet includes a series of explicit arguments about who would win and who POLITICAL REFORM VIA THE INITIATIVE PROCESS 43 would lose under each proposed measure, and lists the names of elites who support and oppose the measures. Over half of California’s voters use information from these pamphlets, relying upon them more than any other source of information when voting on ballot measures (Bowler and Donovan 1998, 57).

Barry Company. CROSSOVER VOTING BEFORE THE BLANKET 35 ———. 1922. Story of the Session of the California Legislature of 1921. San Francisco: Press of the James H. Barry Company. Hill, Gladwin. 1959a. ” New York Times, Sunday, January 18, 64. ———. 1959b. ” New York Times, Monday, March 16, 15. ———. 1959c. ” New York Times, Sunday, April 26, 67. Jones, Bill (Secretary of State of California). 1996. Financing California’s Statewide Ballot Measures: 1996 Primary and General Elections Campaign Receipts and Expenditures through June 30, 1996.

Some crossover voting occurred for the simplest of reasons: no candidate registered with the relevant party filed, and so voters who went to the polls and preferred not to abstain from voting in the given race could only back candidates from other parties. We use the label “no option” for all such crossover voting. In all remaining cases, primary voters did have a choice between candidates registered with their own party (who might or might not have been running in other primaries) and cross-filers who were registered with another party and running in at least one other primary.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.70 of 5 – based on 32 votes